RE: Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??

  • Thread starter T2xlIFNtaXRoLUhhbnNlbg
  • Start date Views 572
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

T2xlIFNtaXRoLUhhbnNlbg

#1
Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista. When
the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?

"JSmith" wrote:

> The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC" addresses.
>
> When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field shows
> "undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
> message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and the
> message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
> messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.
>
> This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
> the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
> reconstruct.
>
>
> --------------> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...40a123591&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general

 

Diane Poremsky

Senior Member
Outlook version
Outlook 2016 32 bit
Email Account
Office 365 Exchange
#2
What antivirus do you use on the vista machine and is it scanning email?

"Ole Smith-Hansen" <Ole Smith-Hansen> wrote in
message news:120CD63A-BBE8-4FD6-9E2E-F8D024CE64FD@microsoft.com...
> Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista.
> When
> the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?
>
>
>
>
> "JSmith" wrote:
>
>> The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC"
>> addresses.
>>
>> When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field
>> shows
>> "undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
>> message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and
>> the
>> message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
>> messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.
>>
>> This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
>> the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
>> reconstruct.
>>
>>
>> -------------->> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
>> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
>> "I
>> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
>> this
>> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
>> then
>> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...40a123591&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general


 
T

T2xlIFNtaXRoLUhhbnNlbg

#3
I am using F-prot which is scanning email

"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote:

> What antivirus do you use on the vista machine and is it scanning email?
>
> >

>

>

>
>

>

>
>

>

>
>

>

>

>
>
> "Ole Smith-Hansen" <Ole Smith-Hansen> wrote in
> message news:120CD63A-BBE8-4FD6-9E2E-F8D024CE64FD@microsoft.com...
> > Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista.
> > When
> > the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "JSmith" wrote:
> >
> >> The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC"
> >> addresses.
> >>
> >> When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field
> >> shows
> >> "undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
> >> message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and
> >> the
> >> message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
> >> messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.
> >>
> >> This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
> >> the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
> >> reconstruct.
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------> >> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> >> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
> >> "I
> >> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> >> this
> >> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
> >> then
> >> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
> >>
> >> http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...40a123591&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general

>
>

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Top