No, you would have to write your own script.
Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
-
"deeceem" <deeceem> wrote in message
news:5AC02AE5-F9B5-43CF-ACC4-5CACA3DA0404@microsoft.com...
> Ok, but is there a way to get outlook to ask me which account to use to
> help
> me use the right account?
> "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
>
> > Why should it? If you were BCC'ed, your e-mail address would not even be
> > in
> > the recipeints list.
>
>> > > Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > "deeceem" <deeceem> wrote in message
> > news:9D5CFD85-311D-400A-9835-C9C244FE5DC4@microsoft.com...
> > > But in Outlook the correct email address shows up in the 'sent to'
> > > field -
> > > ie
> > > the address that the sender used, which is then forwarded on. So why
> > > can't
> > > outlook see that address?
> >> > "Dmitry Streblechenko" wrote:
> >> >> If the message was retrieved (pulled) using an SMTP account, the
> > >> replies
> > >> will be sent using the right account - on the low level, the message
> > >> gets
> > >> stampted with the name and id of the accoutn used to retrieve the
> > >> message.
> > >> If you simply forward (push) the messages from your POP3/IMAP/etc
> > >> server
> > >> to
> > >> your Exchange account, there is no way for Outlook/Exchange to know
> > >> which
> > >> account should be used.
> > >
>> >> > > >> Dmitry Streblechenko (MVP)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> "deeceem" <deeceem> wrote in message
> > >> news:9691B7A0-3A1C-409B-8079-6AB7F3131704@microsoft.com...
> > >> > Hi
> > >>> >> > I am using OL2007 on exchange 2007, have pretty minimal VBA skills
> > >> > (mainly
> > >> > in excel).
> > >>> >> > I have several email addresses (a,b,c) which are all funnelled via
> > >> > my
> > >> > exchange account (d). The problem is that when i reply to an email
> > >> > sent
> > >> > to
> > >> > account a, OL automatically uses my exchange account (d).
> > >>> >> > Is it possible to change this using vba so that outlook chooses the
> > >> > same
> > >> > account to send that the email was sent to?
> > >>> >> > thanks
> > >>> >> > David M
> > >
>> >
>> >> .
> > >>
>
>
>> .
> >